Typical rough canvas but better than I can scratchbuild.
Here's the Pyro 31 Cadillac.
1930 Packard Bottail Speedster
Re: 1930 Packard Bottail Speedster
That is superb!
To make each build less crappy than the last one. Or, put another way, "Better than the last one, not as good as the next one!"..
Re: 1930 Packard Bottail Speedster
For what you started out with that turned out a masterpiece. I'm not kidding even a little. That is the nicest Pyro kit in any form I've ever seen!
I avoid Pyro as a rule simply because as a young man I got burned by a few. Those and Lindberg were to be avoided after I learned the hard way. I latched onto Revell and Monogram and became the model builder I am today. Not saying that the afore mentioned wouldn't have made me a better builder, but they may have broken my spirit.
I avoid Pyro as a rule simply because as a young man I got burned by a few. Those and Lindberg were to be avoided after I learned the hard way. I latched onto Revell and Monogram and became the model builder I am today. Not saying that the afore mentioned wouldn't have made me a better builder, but they may have broken my spirit.
Now that we know that.... What have we learned?...
- jeaton01
- Elite Member
- Posts: 2065
- Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:20 am
- Location: Northern California
- Contact:
Re: 1930 Packard Bottail Speedster
It's shiny, that helps. It was a little bit but not too special to me because as I was growing up we had the chassis of one in our boneyard, the engine was used to power a water well drilling rig and the rest was tossed or left to rot. It still had the frame, wheels and the leather covers were on the springs. The remains did finally go to a museum. It's almost like people were bitter about that sort of wealth during the later years of the depression. At the time that sort of car had little worth.
Re: 1930 Packard Bottail Speedster
You did THAT out of an old Monogram kit? You got some skills man. Fantastic work!
When the sun of culture hangs low even dwarfs throw shadows.