Re: Tamiya 1/32 P-51 D/K
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 5:38 am
Looking great Paul, I'll be watching this one come together!





I agree,however, What I am attempting to do is reason the use for alclad, now the high shiny stuff I can see but when it comes down to the nitty gritty I know those planes didnt look like they were chrome plated for long. I hadn't thought about the doped surfaces but in that case I think that some MM silver or titanium would work there. That stuff looks more like doped fabric to me anyway. I haven't tried any floquil and I am afraid to buy it from the only source here in Okla. That stuff could be higher than a cats back there.LaserEquippedShark wrote:Wow. This is looking really great.
I'm partial to Alclad myself, but those others look convincing as well. Personal taste is what matters I think.
When I was painting mine I ran across a combo that I thought was excellent. all Alclad: Airframe Aluminum on the fuselage, Duraluminum on the wings, and dull aluminum for the doped control surfaces (if you're aircraft has the fabric ones). If you're looking for variety this is a good approach. Generally the wings would have a different look due to the putty process. It's all about what you want in the end though. I like the variation because to me it's more visually appealing.
I wont use MM there because the particles are too large but it does make for a good doped finish. I am hoping to do Pete Petersen's Hurry Home Honey. I was just thinking also how it would look with a dot filter. Maybe gray, blue and silver huesLaserEquippedShark wrote:True. You don't really need to go Alclad if you don't want something more "shiny." It really all depends on what look you are going for and they didn't stay that way long as you said.
If you want variation between the wings and fuselage then I think some MM Silver would work beautifully like you say. I actually really like the square Testors bottle of Aluminum for that look.
I apologize if I missed it, but have you decided on markings?